|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
Letter from the Editor |
For this month’s e-brief, I wanted to revisit a topic that had been brought up in the June 2022 edition by my predecessor, Dr. Batlle, regarding the current state of the ongoing iodinated contrast shortage. As I am sure you have been painfully aware, beginning in April, a COVID-19 related lockdown in Shanghai, China, led to a near halt of production of iohexol contrast at a large GE Healthcare production plant. GE anticipated an 80% reduction in order fulfillment over the course of several months. Now, as summer draws to a close, iodinated contrast supply is still threatened worldwide, though (fortunately) production has been increasing.
As with all times of necessity, this event has forced practices to react and adapt to contrast shortages. Dr. Batlle mentioned one of the earliest articles published about this back in June. A more recent issue of JACR (Volume 19, Issue 7) had several articles on the subject, including formal recommendations from the ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media on suggested methods to conserve contrast (Wang CL et al., JACR 2022;19(7):834-835), as well as additional articles from institutions such as Vanderbilt (Allen LM et al., JACR 2022;19(7):836-840) and the University of North Carolina (Salazar G et al., JACR 2022;19(7):841-845) on how they adapted to the shortage.
I suspect by now most practices have discovered their own way to handle the contrast shortage. However, these articles nicely highlight the resiliency and flexibility of radiology practices in the face of an abrupt scarcity of one of the more common tools we use to take care of our patients. They are worthy of review, if not just for developing solutions to the current shortage for those who may still need one, but also to serve as blueprints for how to approach any other supply chain shortage we may encounter in the future.
I hope everyone enjoyed summer, and now on to the best season of the year: college football season!
|
Andrew Bowman, MD, PhD
Secretary, FRS |
|
Meet Your 2022 – 2023 FRS Executive Committee |
|
President
Chintan Desai, MD, FACR |
|
President Elect
Laura Vallow, MD
|
|
Treasurer
Juan Batlle, MD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRS President’s Message |
Interesting articles and links below to share Payer Steerage: Who is Really Steering the Ship? Click Here
2023-Another year of proposed Medicare cuts while the inflation and labor cost continue to skyrocket. In 2023, CMS estimates an overall impact of the MPFS proposed changes to radiology to be a 3% decrease, a 4% decrease for interventional radiology, a 3% decrease for nuclear medicine, and a 1% decrease for radiation oncology and radiation therapy centers if the provisions within the proposed rule are finalized. Click Here
Flagging survey findings for public scrutiny, the ACR says insurers using primary-care rates to pay specialists may be doing so in violation of the No Surprises Act. Click Here
|
Very Respectfully,
Chintan Desai, MD, FACR
President, Florida Radiological Society |
|
|
Secretary,
Andrew Bowman, MD, PhD |
|
Past President
Rajendra Kedar, MD, FACR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRBMA President’s Message |
MERIT-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): The Windfall that Never Was
Many of our radiology practices have invested time and resources in the never-ending quest to maximize our MIPS performance and experience the promised double digit Medicare fee adjustments highlighted in the program. The disappointing reality is that the maximum adjustments experienced since 2017 have been underwhelmingly capped at less than 2%. An amount that doesn’t even offset the mandatory 2% sequestration adjustment in place since 2013. The reason for this may lie in the fact that a high percentage of practices are hitting the top scores which, in turn, dilutes the incentive monies available in this budget neutral program.As a result, the measures become more difficult or capped to a level that does not provide the points necessary to obtain the top 100 pts.
As many of you know, the MIPS program experienced fundamental changes in the 2022 performance year. Most notably, the methodology for establishing performance thresholds, which dictate reimbursement adjustments for most fee schedule services, fundamentally shifted from an arbitrary process to one based on historical performance benchmarks. As a result, the MIPS 2022 published methodology provides for a maximum payment adjustment of 15.4%, 10% of which will only come into play if a practice scores above the exceptional performance threshold of 89/100pts. This represents a change from 2021 where the exceptional performance bonus was triggered by scoring 85+ pts. The actual maximum adjustment is announced once the economic considerations that mandate the budget neutral nature of the program have been determined post 2022 result submissions. In addition to the shifting exceptional performance target, the penalty threshold was increased to 75 pts from 60 pts in 2021. Any practice that falls below 75 will be subject to a negative adjustment penalty of up to -9%.
In preparing for MIPS 2023 it is important for practices to be aware of some significant changes in the proposed methodology.
- Estimated maximum payment adjustment 6.9% representing 100pt score.
- Elimination of Exceptional Performance Bonus
- Penalty threshold remains at 75 points
- No changes in Cost portion of score which remains at 30%.
- Measures without a benchmark earn 0 points even when data completeness (70%) and case minimums (20) are met
- Small practice (</=15 clinicians) continue to earn 3 points
-
- Does not apply to new measures that are in the first 2 performance years of the program) Measures with a benchmark earn from 1 – 10 points (3pt floor is removed)
- Multiple quality measure and improvement activity changes.
For fact sheets on proposed changes and comparison tables Click Here
The time to review and plan is now to position your radiology practice for the best possible outcome and avoid future penalties.
|
Lisa Adams, CEO, MBA
President, FRBMA |
|
|
|
|
|
Legislative Update |
We are less than seventy days out from the general election here in Florida and please anticipate your airways and mailboxes to be filled with appeals for your vote. Pro tip: If you vote early then the calls and mail will cease.
The primary election results are in but are not officially finalized on the Division of Election website. However, all the races have been decided.
If you are in the Tampa market, Karen Gonzalez Pittman won her crowded primary and has a general election candidate to overcome in order to make it to the Florida House. I know that any help you can give her would be greatly appreciated.
Unfortunately, Robyn Hattaway, lost her primary race although she won her home county. She lost in Volusia which had more voters.
In the closest loss of this election cycle, Rep Fetterhoff, lost her bid for re-election by 31 votes to Rep Barnaby in a very closely contested race between these two incumbents drawn through reapportionment into the same house seat. She has conceded her race.
Please make sure you all vote as you can see from my above remarks it is very important.
If you have any questions on your local races and who the FRS is supporting, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Happy Fall! |
Alison Dudley, FRS Lobbyist
AlisonDudley@dudleyandassociates.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5K Run/Walk Winners |
Thanks to all the participants in the inaugural FRS Foundation 5K run and walk. We would like to congratulate our medalists for this special event:
5K Run
Gold: Santo Maimone, MD
Silver: Jennifer Peterson, MD
Bronze: Haley Letter, MD
5K Walk
Gold: Rajendra Kedar, MD, FACR
Silver: Philip Cook, MD, FACR
Bronze: Tracy Phipps, CPA |
|
|
|
|
Job Posting Opportunities |
Florida Radiological Society is pleased to introduce the opportunity for interested parties to advertise for potential jobs in our monthly FRS Ebrief bulletin.
Advertisement pricing is as follows:
Ebrief Job Posting pricing:
3 months ($100 monthly)
6 months ($90 monthly)
12 months ($80 monthly)
Please contact Lorraine Roger, our Society Administrator for further information on how to advertise in our monthly publication.
Phone: (813) 806-1070
Fax: (813) 806-1071
Email: lroger@flrad.org
We feel that this will provide a valuable service to both our members and our Florida community of Radiology.
|
|
|
|
|
Become a PAC Member Today |
Attention FRBMA Members! Please support the cause. We encourage you to be PAC members and supporters; you do not have to belong to the FRS. Donations can be made online through our PAC website www.FLRADPAC.org. Thank you for your donation: Dr. Mergo
It is critical that we support both our Florida PAC and RADPAC in order to bolster our voice in Tallahassee and Washington, respectively. Please join FRS lobbyist Alison Dudley in her special appeal for all Florida radiologists to become Florida PAC members. If you would like to help FRS defend radiology against untoward legislation and introduce bills that have a positive impact on our practices, we need your financial support to re-elect our friends in the state House and Senate. The FRS can also show you simplified ways on how to sign up your radiology group. Contact Lorraine Roger or contact Alison Dudley at for more information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone (813) 806-1070 • Fax (813) 806-1071
5620 W. Sligh Avenue • Tampa, Florida 33634
|
|
The E-Brief is an exclusive member benefit of Florida Radiological Society, delivering monthly member, chapter and industry news. Please do not reply to this automatic e-mail. For comments or questions about the E-Brief, please contact lroger@flrad.org. |
|
|