|
|
Table of Contents
|
FRS Membership Dues |
Please contact the American College of Radiology Membership Services at (800) 347-7748 to pay your 2024 Florida Radiological Society membership dues. |
|
Letter from the Editor |
Absolutely, I’d be happy to discuss the pros and cons of sub-specialization and advanced general practice in the field of radiology, particularly in terms of their viability within various practice settings: private practice, academic, and employed radiology settings.
Sub-Specialization:
Pros:
Expertise and Reputation: Sub-specialization allows radiologists to become experts in a specific area, enhancing their reputation among referring physicians and patients. This can lead to increased referrals and recognition.
Higher Reimbursements: Sub-specialists often perform complex procedures or interpretations that can command higher reimbursement rates from insurance companies, resulting in potentially higher income.
Efficiency and Quality: Focusing on a particular area enables radiologists to develop deep knowledge and streamlined workflows, potentially leading to higher efficiency and diagnostic accuracy.
Academic Opportunities: Sub-specialists often contribute to research and education in their niche, which can be particularly attractive for those interested in academic careers.
Cons:
Narrow Scope: Sub-specialization limits the variety of cases a radiologist sees, which might lead to professional burnout or a decrease in overall skill breadth.
Market Fluctuations: If the demand for a specific sub-specialty decline, it could impact the viability of the practice, especially in a private practice setting.
Initial Investment: Developing expertise in a sub-specialty may require additional training, resources, and time, which could delay financial returns.
Referral Dependency: A sub-specialist’s practice heavily relies on referrals from other physicians. A shift in referral patterns can impact patient volume.
General Practice:
Pros:
Diverse Case Load: Advanced generalists see a wider variety of cases, which can keep the work engaging and maintain a broad skill set.
Flexibility: Generalists can adapt to changing market demands by interpreting a broader range of studies, making them potentially more resilient to market fluctuations.
Efficient Staffing: In smaller practices or community settings, having generalists can lead to more flexible staffing arrangements.
Patient Relationships: Continuity of care can be enhanced as generalists might follow patients across different modalities and conditions.
Cons:
Lower Reimbursements: Generalists may perform more routine interpretations, which could lead to lower reimbursement rates compared to specialized procedures.
Specialization Appeal: Referring physicians and patients might prefer sub-specialists for complex cases due to their perceived expertise.
Academic Limitations: In academic settings, research and educational opportunities might be more limited for generalists compared to sub-specialists.
Competitive Landscape: In some markets, the competition among generalists can be fierce, potentially impacting patient volume and financial stability.
Conclusion: The choice between sub-specialization and advanced general practice in radiology depends on individual preferences, market dynamics, and the setting of practice. In private practice, both strategies have their merits and challenges. Sub-specialization can lead to higher reimbursements and recognition, but comes with the risk of narrow expertise and market fluctuations. Advanced general practice offers diversity and flexibility, but may face lower reimbursements and increased competition. In academic and employed settings, the emphasis might vary based on research and educational opportunities. Striking the right balance between sub-specialization and advanced general practice is key to achieving financial solvency and professional satisfaction.
CHATGPT Series #2
|
Edem Chen, MD
Secretary, FRS |
|
Meet Your 2023 – 2024 FRS Executive Committee |
|
President
Laura Vallow, MD |
|
President Elect
Juan Batlle, MD
|
|
Treasurer
Andrew Bowman, MD, PhD |
|
Secretary,
Edem Chen, MD |
|
Past President
Chintan Desai, MD, FACR |
|
Radiation Oncology, Chair
Jennifer Peterson, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRS President’s Message |
Radiomics- Beyond Imaging….
Radiation Oncology and Radiology share a fascinating history, from Roentgen to Marie Curie to the orthovoltage, megavoltage era when the first treating radiation oncologists were in fact radiologists.
It is fascinating how as the fields diverged, radiology continues to play an important role in oncology and will continue to be the cornerstone of oncology management decisions. Radiological imaging has long been an important tool to aid in clinical decision making. This role is rapidly evolving from being a diagnostic tool to playing a central role in personalized medicine, most notably cancer.Radiomics is the bridge between imaging and clinical decision making. Radiomics is a field combining computer science, artificial intelligence, and radiology to enhance the precision of medical imaging. Data is obtained by extracting many numerical attributes from radiographic medical images. These numerical radiomics data can reveal disease attributes invisible to the naked eye. For example, a multislice image of a patient contains millions of voxels. In addition, a tumor is expressed with hundreds of features that define the tumor’s structure, size, shape, and textures. Radiomics attempts to combine this data to a clinical outcome. When this process is applied, medical images are converted into a high dimensional mineable space.
This leads to the determination of subtype and genotype of tumors with the use of radiomics. The application has important advances in histopathological diagnoses because they are non-invasive and obtain information from the entire tissue. In oncology, radiomics has shown great potential for the characterization and clinical monitoring of various disease including brain tumors, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. Examples of this exciting work include using a trained DL network to predict response of brain mets after stereotactic radiotherapy and differentiation of radionecrosis from tumor progression following treatment. Early success of radiomics has been observed in the setting of tumors being treated with immunotherapy. For example, radiomic signatures that correlate with tumor infiltration of lymphocytes or that predict benefit from immunotherapy have been described. This allows medical imaging to provide diagnostic and prognostic data and potentially identify patients that would benefit from therapy. As radiomics becomes increasingly more important, there has been an explosion of medical imaging data. There are many challenges that need to be faced including large-scale data sharing to validate findings. In addition, standardization of data collection, evaluation criteria and reporting guidelines will be necessary as the field of radiomics progresses.
The NIH has released a new dataset that could provide insights for radiology researchers. The dataset standardizes genomic, proteomic, imaging, and clinical data from individual studies of more than 1,000 tumors across 10 disease sites. This imaging and clinical data could depict patterns in tumor development, growth, and location. This data set generated at the NCI is a publicly available resource. Click Here
Radiology and radiation oncology share history and with future “omics” research, will share an incredible future with improved diagnostics leading to personalized precision therapies.
|
Laura Vallow, MD
President, Florida Radiological Society |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRBMA President’s Message |
Remote MRI – Are We There Yet?
As we navigate the post-COVID waters of a “return to normal” mentality, one thing is for certain; the definition of normal has evolved. Prior to 2020, the footprint of home delivery for everything from groceries to telehealth was not widely adapted. Since that time; however, many people now consider Door Dash, Uber Eats, and Instacart part of their daily routine. Front porches appear awkwardly out of place if there are no Amazon boxes piled next to the door. From a healthcare perspective, the option to see your provider in-person or via zoom is now commonplace and gaining in popularity. The option to work remotely from home has transitioned from an employment perk to a job search requirement, particularly from the standpoint of a generation raised with online learning, socialization, and the awareness that everything can be done from the comfort of your couch.
During the pandemic, we made arrangements for many non-patient-facing positions to continue their roles remotely. Some of these roles continue today as hybrid positions with the ability to work remotely as needed. The only area seemingly tied to the traditional workplace are those individuals who work directly with the patients performing their diagnostic imaging, our technologists. This too, however, is now becoming blurry with the evolution and growing momentum of remote scanning in radiology. The primary modality gaining in popularity for this shift in health care delivery is MRI.
What does remote scanning in MRI entail and why are organizations leaning towards this evolving trend? With continued reimbursement cuts and escalating staffing costs, businesses are faced with the challenge of increasing efficiency and throughput to offset their declining collections. Maximizing schedules and capacity of equipment carrying price tags in the millions must be a focus for any imaging department or center to survive and thrive. The simple answer, extend hours and days of operation. A solution that provides improved access to care for our patients and increased contribution to the bottom line. The simple answer, however, is not so simple as it relies on a critical variable in order to succeed; the availability of technical staff to perform the studies during these expanded hours. It is already difficult to hire and retain quality technologists during a time when competitors are throwing pay scales out the window and traveling companies are offering the ultimate carrot of “discovering the world while making big money”. The prospect of adding additional afterhours and weekend shifts is one that must be carefully planned and often not feasible for a staff that is already pushed to their limits with add-on patients, overtime and callouts. Enter in the possibility of remote scanning.
Remote scanning allows a technologist to scan a patient from a different location than the scanner itself. The patient is screened, prepped and positioned by an ancillary staff member trained in MRI and patient safety. The software required for remote scanning is already offered by companies such as Siemens and Philips to provide oversight and operation of their equipment. The remote scanning can be performed from an alternate location or fully remote, providing greater patient access without the limitation of onsite technologist availability. This capability, like teleradiology, can remove the 24/7 staffing constraints along with the geographic barriers common in rural areas. It can also allow for more advanced studies to be performed by quality technologists who are specialty trained, broadening the offerings for our patients.
Considerations for implementing this type of program are significant. The greatest limiting factor that seems to be keeping the process from moving at break-neck speed is patient safety and quality of care. An organization interested in implementing a remote MRI platform must take the time to develop a comprehensive plan that documents all policies and procedures necessary to insure our patients’ well-being. The most common question and area of concern is determining who the individual will be assisting the patient while the technologist is remote. Whether this is a technologist assistant, medical assistant, nurse or another technologist, clear expectations for training and responsibilities of the attending staff are crucial. Although we all have safety protocols for contrast reactions, emergency responses and MRI specific shutdowns and quenches, it is important to address these protocols within the context of remote scanning. The timing for pre-screening patients who are scheduled for after hour or weekend scans along with determinations for contrast use must also be considered. As with other remote processes, back-up staffing and procedures need to be put in place in the event there is a connectivity failure for the remote technologists.
Remote scanning has arrived in Florida for our MRI patients. For anyone who is considering implementing a program, great care must be taken to ensure that the level of safety and quality oversight is exceptionally high. As our equipment manufacturers become more sophisticated in their offerings, the appeal for being able to provide MRI service to our patients with less constraints on on-site staffing will certainly grow and the landscape of this service line will evolve. |
Lisa Adams, CEO, MBA
President, FRBMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legislative Update |
Happy September! I hope everyone made it safely through Hurricane Idalia with minimal property damage. Thankfully Tallahassee was spared the brunt of this fast-moving hurricane.
The Legislative Session starts this year January 9, 2024. Committee meetings commence the week of September 18th during which Representative Danny Perez will be officially elected Speaker Designee. The Senate will not be meeting that week as the removal of asbestos construction will still be ongoing. They have scheduled to start meeting in October.
Legislation is starting to be filed for the upcoming session. Most recently, HB 11 was filed by Representative “Dr.” Joel Rudman, family practice doctor, which is of interest. HB 11 proposes to ban noncompete contracts for medical doctors and osteopathic doctors. More legislation is being filed as we gear up for the legislative session.
Campaign season is well underway and members are very busy fundraising.
It will be a very busy fall!
|
Alison Dudley, FRS Lobbyist
AlisonDudley@dudleyandassociates.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Job Posting Opportunities |
Florida Radiological Society is pleased to introduce the opportunity for interested parties to advertise for potential jobs in our monthly FRS Ebrief bulletin.
Advertisement pricing is as follows:
Ebrief Job Posting pricing:
3 months ($100 monthly)
6 months ($90 monthly)
12 months ($80 monthly)
Please contact Lorraine Roger, our Society Administrator for further information on how to advertise in our monthly publication.
Phone: (813) 806-1070
Fax: (813) 806-1071
Email: lroger@flrad.org
We feel that this will provide a valuable service to both our members and our Florida community of Radiology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Become a PAC Member Today |
Attention FRBMA Members! Please support the cause. We encourage you to be PAC members and supporters; you do not have to belong to the FRS. Donations can be made online through our PAC website www.FLRADPAC.org. Thank you for your donation: Drs. Keller, Letter.
It is critical that we support both our Florida PAC and RADPAC in order to bolster our voice in Tallahassee and Washington, respectively. Please join FRS lobbyist Alison Dudley in her special appeal for all Florida radiologists to become Florida PAC members. If you would like to help FRS defend radiology against untoward legislation and introduce bills that have a positive impact on our practices, we need your financial support to re-elect our friends in the state House and Senate. The FRS can also show you simplified ways on how to sign up your radiology group. Contact Lorraine Roger or contact Alison Dudley at for more information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone (813) 806-1070 • Fax (813) 806-1071
5620 W. Sligh Avenue • Tampa, Florida 33634
|
|
The E-Brief is an exclusive member benefit of Florida Radiological Society, delivering monthly member, chapter and industry news. Please do not reply to this automatic e-mail. For comments or questions about the E-Brief, please contact lroger@flrad.org. |
|
|